AI Model Spend Leaderboard

Estimated dollars spent per model, based on real token usage routed through OpenRouter and live per-token pricing. Every figure is an estimate — see methodology for the input/output ratio assumption.

Total est. spend (7d)
$38.51M
Top spender
Claude Opus 4.7
Top spender · 7d
$13.91M
Models tracked
20
#ModelProvider Tokens (7d) Blended $/M Est. Spend (7d) Range
1 Claude Opus 4.7
agentic
Anthropic 2.11T $6.60 $13.91M $12.64M – $23.18M
2 MiniMax M3
agentic
MiniMax 3.95T $1.49 $5.88M $5.45M – $9.01M
3 MiMo V2.5
general
Xiaomi 8.68T $0.43 $3.77M $2.99M – $4.95M
4 Claude Sonnet 4.6
agentic
Anthropic 942.07B $3.96 $3.73M $3.39M – $6.22M
5 GPT-5.5
agentic
OpenAI 677.88B $3.96 $2.68M $2.44M – $4.47M
6 GPT-5.4
general
OpenAI 403.14B $4.38 $1.76M $1.26M – $2.52M
7 Claude Opus 4.6
agentic
Anthropic 213.33B $6.60 $1.41M $1.28M – $2.35M
8 Gemini 3 Flash Preview
chat
Google 947.10B $1.13 $1.07M $591.9K – $1.18M
9 Step 3.7 Flash
chat
Other 893.53B $0.88 $781.8K $513.8K – $848.9K
10 DeepSeek V4 Pro
agentic
DeepSeek 2.47T $0.32 $781.6K $766.8K – $890.4K
11 DeepSeek V4 Flash
chat
DeepSeek 5.24T $0.12 $628.8K $419.2K – $681.3K
12 MiMo V2.5 Pro
agentic
Xiaomi 633.77B $0.98 $618.6K $576.7K – $925.3K
13 Gemini 2.5 Flash
chat
Google 608.23B $0.85 $517.0K $249.4K – $583.9K
14 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
chat
Google 532.58B $0.56 $299.6K $166.4K – $332.9K
15 Gemini 3.5 Flash
chat
Google 300.37B $0.85 $255.3K $123.2K – $288.4K
16 GPT-5.4 Mini
chat
OpenAI 190.49B $0.70 $133.3K $87.6K – $144.8K
17 DeepSeek V3.2
general
DeepSeek 346.23B $0.30 $104.2K $99.4K – $111.5K
18 GLM-5.1
general
Z-AI 122.52B $0.73 $88.8K $70.5K – $116.4K
19 GPT-4o Mini
chat
OpenAI 232.92B $0.26 $61.1K $40.2K – $66.4K
20 GPT-5.4 Nano
chat
OpenAI 151.16B $0.14 $20.8K $10.2K – $23.4K

Source: OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings), as of —.

Methodology

How we estimate spend. OpenRouter publishes daily token totals per model (prompt + completion tokens combined). We multiply those totals by each model's published per-token pricing to estimate dollars spent.

The input/output caveat. OpenRouter's dataset does not split tokens into input vs. output, and output tokens typically cost 3–5× more than input tokens. We therefore apply an assumed mix — by default 85% input / 15% output for general traffic, and more input-heavy assumptions (90–92%) for coding and agentic models, reflecting how production agent workloads consume context. Because this is an assumption, every figure is shown with a range: the low bound assumes a 95/5 input-heavy mix, the high bound assumes 70/30.

What this does and doesn't capture. Figures reflect usage routed through OpenRouter only — not direct API traffic to OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, etc. — so treat them as directional, not total-market. Prompt-caching discounts are not reflected, which may overstate spend on heavily cached models. Token counts come from each provider's own tokenizer, so cross-model token comparisons are approximate; dollar math is unaffected.