AI Model Spend Leaderboard
Estimated dollars spent per model, based on real token usage routed through OpenRouter and live per-token pricing. Every figure is an estimate — see methodology for the input/output ratio assumption.
| # | Model | Provider | Tokens (7d) | Blended $/M | Est. Spend (7d) | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Opus 4.7 agentic |
Anthropic | 2.11T | $6.60 | $13.91M | $12.64M – $23.18M |
| 2 | MiniMax M3 agentic |
MiniMax | 3.95T | $1.49 | $5.88M | $5.45M – $9.01M |
| 3 | MiMo V2.5 general |
Xiaomi | 8.68T | $0.43 | $3.77M | $2.99M – $4.95M |
| 4 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 agentic |
Anthropic | 942.07B | $3.96 | $3.73M | $3.39M – $6.22M |
| 5 | GPT-5.5 agentic |
OpenAI | 677.88B | $3.96 | $2.68M | $2.44M – $4.47M |
| 6 | GPT-5.4 general |
OpenAI | 403.14B | $4.38 | $1.76M | $1.26M – $2.52M |
| 7 | Claude Opus 4.6 agentic |
Anthropic | 213.33B | $6.60 | $1.41M | $1.28M – $2.35M |
| 8 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview chat |
947.10B | $1.13 | $1.07M | $591.9K – $1.18M | |
| 9 | Step 3.7 Flash chat |
Other | 893.53B | $0.88 | $781.8K | $513.8K – $848.9K |
| 10 | DeepSeek V4 Pro agentic |
DeepSeek | 2.47T | $0.32 | $781.6K | $766.8K – $890.4K |
| 11 | DeepSeek V4 Flash chat |
DeepSeek | 5.24T | $0.12 | $628.8K | $419.2K – $681.3K |
| 12 | MiMo V2.5 Pro agentic |
Xiaomi | 633.77B | $0.98 | $618.6K | $576.7K – $925.3K |
| 13 | Gemini 2.5 Flash chat |
608.23B | $0.85 | $517.0K | $249.4K – $583.9K | |
| 14 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite chat |
532.58B | $0.56 | $299.6K | $166.4K – $332.9K | |
| 15 | Gemini 3.5 Flash chat |
300.37B | $0.85 | $255.3K | $123.2K – $288.4K | |
| 16 | GPT-5.4 Mini chat |
OpenAI | 190.49B | $0.70 | $133.3K | $87.6K – $144.8K |
| 17 | DeepSeek V3.2 general |
DeepSeek | 346.23B | $0.30 | $104.2K | $99.4K – $111.5K |
| 18 | GLM-5.1 general |
Z-AI | 122.52B | $0.73 | $88.8K | $70.5K – $116.4K |
| 19 | GPT-4o Mini chat |
OpenAI | 232.92B | $0.26 | $61.1K | $40.2K – $66.4K |
| 20 | GPT-5.4 Nano chat |
OpenAI | 151.16B | $0.14 | $20.8K | $10.2K – $23.4K |
Source: OpenRouter (openrouter.ai/rankings), as of —.
Methodology
How we estimate spend. OpenRouter publishes daily token totals per model (prompt + completion tokens combined). We multiply those totals by each model's published per-token pricing to estimate dollars spent.
The input/output caveat. OpenRouter's dataset does not split tokens into input vs. output, and output tokens typically cost 3–5× more than input tokens. We therefore apply an assumed mix — by default 85% input / 15% output for general traffic, and more input-heavy assumptions (90–92%) for coding and agentic models, reflecting how production agent workloads consume context. Because this is an assumption, every figure is shown with a range: the low bound assumes a 95/5 input-heavy mix, the high bound assumes 70/30.
What this does and doesn't capture. Figures reflect usage routed through OpenRouter only — not direct API traffic to OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, etc. — so treat them as directional, not total-market. Prompt-caching discounts are not reflected, which may overstate spend on heavily cached models. Token counts come from each provider's own tokenizer, so cross-model token comparisons are approximate; dollar math is unaffected.